Comments - Subject-centric computing - Global Sensemaking2024-03-29T06:29:42Zhttp://globalsensemaking.net/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=2052744%3ABlogPost%3A1341&xn_auth=noBut, I didn't say that!
In w…tag:globalsensemaking.net,2008-05-07:2052744:Comment:17652008-05-07T21:43:28.000ZJack Parkhttp://globalsensemaking.net/profile/JackPark
But, I didn't say that!<br />
<br />
In writing a paper for the upcoming TMRA workshop in Leipzig, I described the process this way: we bind subjects to documents by telling stories. We later harvest those subjects into indexes and maps. We later rebind those subjects into other documents by telling more stories about them. Documents are vehicles, or embedding context. Agree.<br />
<br />
Evaluating pro and con arguments, their premises, etc, is an exercise in subject identification partially facilitated by the…
But, I didn't say that!<br />
<br />
In writing a paper for the upcoming TMRA workshop in Leipzig, I described the process this way: we bind subjects to documents by telling stories. We later harvest those subjects into indexes and maps. We later rebind those subjects into other documents by telling more stories about them. Documents are vehicles, or embedding context. Agree.<br />
<br />
Evaluating pro and con arguments, their premises, etc, is an exercise in subject identification partially facilitated by the addressable documents that carry them. I'm not sure we have anything like a <i>best practices</i> for subject identification. Simple URIs for documents do more to locate the document but appear to say little, if anything, about the subject(s) entrained in the document.<br />
<br />
Please talk more about using documents as frameworks for resolving subjects. Thanks! "It's the Subject, Stupid!" i…tag:globalsensemaking.net,2008-05-07:2052744:Comment:17602008-05-07T20:43:33.000ZMark Szpakowskihttp://globalsensemaking.net/profile/MarkSzpakowski
"It's the Subject, Stupid!" is kind of doubly self-referential.<br />
<br />
From a kind of syntactical point of view the compound document folks of a couple of decades ago were on the same track. A document is made out of multiply-reference-able Addressable Information Objects (AIRS) - the pieces have permalinks. You're talking about document as embedding context for subject representations. And the framework for resolving subjects.<br />
<br />
Something like this could be used to see if apples and apples are being…
"It's the Subject, Stupid!" is kind of doubly self-referential.<br />
<br />
From a kind of syntactical point of view the compound document folks of a couple of decades ago were on the same track. A document is made out of multiply-reference-able Addressable Information Objects (AIRS) - the pieces have permalinks. You're talking about document as embedding context for subject representations. And the framework for resolving subjects.<br />
<br />
Something like this could be used to see if apples and apples are being compared when evaluating pro- and con- co-premises (thinking of the discussion thread on Collaborative Climate simulation models (wish I could link it into here more simply)). Hah! What about DebateGraph?tag:globalsensemaking.net,2008-04-28:2052744:Comment:13652008-04-28T23:36:29.000ZJack Parkhttp://globalsensemaking.net/profile/JackPark
Hah! What about DebateGraph?
Hah! What about DebateGraph? Would be nice to have a "real…tag:globalsensemaking.net,2008-04-28:2052744:Comment:13632008-04-28T23:36:13.000ZJack Parkhttp://globalsensemaking.net/profile/JackPark
Would be nice to have a "real" (in the KMi sense) place to have such a discussion...
Would be nice to have a "real" (in the KMi sense) place to have such a discussion... Jack,
Thanks for pointing to…tag:globalsensemaking.net,2008-04-28:2052744:Comment:13612008-04-28T23:01:33.000ZDavid Pricehttp://globalsensemaking.net/profile/DavidPrice
Jack,<br />
<br />
Thanks for pointing to the presentation—and can't wait to have a detailed discussion with you about this.<br />
<br />
David
Jack,<br />
<br />
Thanks for pointing to the presentation—and can't wait to have a detailed discussion with you about this.<br />
<br />
David